News
It’s official: The Supreme Court just killed your TikTok feed

Just a heads up, if you buy something through our links, we may get a small share of the sale. It’s one of the ways we keep the lights on here. Click here for more.
In a landmark decision that could reshape social media in America, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a federal law on Friday that will effectively ban TikTok in the United States unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, sells the platform by Sunday.
Yup, this Sunday.
The Court rejected arguments that the law violated First Amendment rights, with the justices emphasizing national security concerns.
“The cases before us present an unprecedented challenge to national security and data privacy,” wrote the Court in its opinion, underlining the gravity of the situation.
White House Response
The White House has taken a measured stance on the ruling.
“Given the sheer fact of timing, this Administration recognizes that actions to implement the law simply must fall to the next administration,” stated White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, effectively passing the responsibility to the incoming Trump administration.
ByteDance and TikTok’s Position
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew issued a strong response to the ruling, stating he “wants to thank U.S. President-elect Donald Trump for his commitment to work with the company” while maintaining hope for a resolution.
The company has warned that “the app will have to ‘go dark’ in the United States on Sunday barring a last-minute intervention from the Biden administration.”
Impact on Users
If the ban takes effect, TikTok will become illegal to distribute in the U.S., and existing users will gradually lose functionality.
The platform’s 170 million American users face an uncertain future as the Sunday deadline approaches.
Recent reports from Bloomberg suggest that Chinese officials are exploring potential sale options, though they strongly prefer TikTok to remain under ByteDance’s ownership.
The Security Concerns
U.S. officials have long expressed concerns about TikTok’s data collection practices and potential for surveillance.
Critics argue that the app could be used as a vehicle for espionage, with access to phone records and personal data potentially falling into the hands of the Chinese government.
However, digital rights organizations like Amnesty International caution that “banning TikTok does nothing to address the endemic human rights risks and harms associated with the surveillance-based business models” of major tech platforms.
As the Sunday deadline approaches, millions of American users await clarity on the platform’s fate.
Meanwhile, content creators and businesses that rely on TikTok for their livelihood face an uncertain future that could mark the end of an era in social media history.
What are your thoughts on the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the TikTok ban? How do you feel about the potential impact on free speech and national security? We’d love to hear your perspective! Share your opinions in the comments below.
Follow us on Flipboard, Google News, or Apple News
