UK CMA says Apple and Google are holding back mobile browsers

Just a heads up, if you buy something through our links, we may get a small share of the sale. It’s one of the ways we keep the lights on here. Click here for more.

The UK’s regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), has found that the mobile browser market is not innovating as it should. 

The report points fingers at Apple and Google for limiting competition, making it harder for other browsers to compete.

All web browsers on iPhones must use Apple’s WebKit engine, which means they rely on the same technology as Safari. This restriction prevents developers from creating unique, independent browsers. 

Additionally, Safari has an advantage over its rivals since it comes pre-installed as the default browser. While users can change their default browser, Apple’s setup makes it inconvenient.

Google’s Android system also has similar issues. Google Chrome is pre-installed on most Android devices, making it the default option for many users. This setup discourages people from trying out other browsers. 

The CMA also raised concerns about a financial arrangement between Apple and Google. Google pays Apple a large sum of money to remain the iPhone’s default search engine. 

This deal reduces Apple’s motivation to improve Safari’s search features, as it benefits financially from keeping Google in place.

Since the CMA started its investigation, both Apple and Google have made some changes, allowing users more flexibility in choosing their browsers. 

However, these changes haven’t fully addressed the issue. To improve competition, the CMA has suggested significant reforms. (Via: The Verge)

These include allowing developers to use different browser engines on iPhones, requiring a “browser choice” screen during device setup, and stopping Apple and Google from making exclusive financial deals.

While these recommendations aren’t enforceable yet, that could change soon. The CMA is currently investigating whether Apple and Google have too much control over mobile platforms under a new UK law. 

If found guilty, they could face strict rules and hefty fines: up to 10% of their yearly revenue. The final decision on this matter is expected later this year.

What do you think about CMA’s stand on the topic? Do you think regulations should exist to ensure this doesn’t happen? We want to hear from you below in the comments, or reach out via our Twitter or Facebook.